Skip to content

Public sector & government

Public bodies are held to a high bar of transparency, fairness and accountability when AI affects citizens’ access to services, benefits or rights. Gamut gives digital, policy and assurance teams a defensible operating layer to govern these systems and answer to oversight bodies, the public and the press.

  • Eligibility and benefits decisioning.
  • Casework triage and prioritisation.
  • Risk and fraud scoring across programmes.
  • Citizen-facing assistants and service chatbots.
  • Document processing and identity verification.
  • Transparency and accountability. Decisions affecting citizens must be explainable and owned.
  • EU AI Act. Many public-service uses (eligibility, essential services) are high-risk.
  • NAGF. For Nigerian public bodies, NITDA-aligned governance, inventory, impact-assessment and ethics expectations.
  • Equality and fairness duties. Evidence against discriminatory outcomes.

How Gamut solves it: register and tier the system through intake (public-facing and automated-decision flags push it high), route to GTSAF and the EU AI Act, and evidence human oversight, appeal routes and fairness testing.

Demonstrate NITDA-aligned governance for a Nigerian agency

Section titled “Demonstrate NITDA-aligned governance for a Nigerian agency”

How Gamut solves it: route to NAGF for the seven governance sections, maintain the AI inventory in AI System Records, and generate a NITDA-aligned governance policy.

Publish accountable, explainable governance

Section titled “Publish accountable, explainable governance”

How Gamut solves it: the audit log and traceable evidence chain let you show oversight bodies exactly how each classification and control conclusion was reached, and a board pack summarises it for leadership and the public record.

  1. Build the inventory in AI System Records, using the Discovery Inbox to surface shadow AI across departments.
  2. Run intake and confirm tiers, flagging public-facing and automated decisions.
  3. Route to GTSAF, EU AI Act and, where relevant, NAGF.
  4. Evidence oversight, transparency and fairness in the Evidence Tracker.
  5. Track gaps on the Remediation Roadmap.
  6. Produce accountable reporting from reporting.

GTSAF, EU AI Act, NAGF, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42005 for impact assessment.